Ahammed Hassan v. The Circle Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/27TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12134 of 2013 (N) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------------

1. AHAMMED HASSAN, AGED 54 YEARS, SON OF HASSAN, CHOLAKKAL, HOUSE NO.4/343, MATTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. MARIYUMMA, AGED 53 YEARS, WIFE OF AHAMMED HASSAN, CHOLAKKAL, HOUSE NO. 4/343, MATTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.BOBY MATHEW SMT.K.MEERA RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODAKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT-678 114.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLIKULANGARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT-678 112.

3. UMMER, SON OF AHAMMED HASSAN, CHOLAKKAL, HOUSE NO. 4/343, MATTATHUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, VELLIKULANGARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-678 154.

R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 12134 of 2013 (N) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------ NIL RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.12134 of 2013 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of October 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J Petitioners have approached this Court seeking police protection. It is stated that the 3rd respondent is harassing the petitioners and is indulging in illegal activities by which petitioners apprehend loss of life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of the interim order passed by this Court on 10/05/2013, 3rd respondent is keeping quite. 3.

Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we direct the 2nd respondent to ensure maintenance of law and order and also to keep constant vigil on the activities of the 3rd respondent.

With the above observation, this writ petition is closed reserving liberty of the petitioners to approach the police if there is any further threat from the 3rd respondent. (sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) True Copy PA to Judge jsr/19/10/2015