Bijimol v. The Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/19TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12153 of 2013 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------- BIJIMOL, W/O. BALAKRISHNAN, M.K.NIVAS, KOONAYIL CHERIYIL, PARAVOOR P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.B.S.SWATHY KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) KOLLAM, PIN-673 307.
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVOOR POLICE STATION, PIN-691 301.
3. VIPIN BALACHANDRAN CLAVARA THODIYIL KOONAYIL, PARAVOOR P.O.
KOLLAM-691 301.
R BY GOVT. PLEADER C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 12153 of 2013 (T) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT.18.4.2013 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2 : COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD.23.4.2013 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS -------------------------: NIL /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE.
ASHOK BHUSHAN , Ag. CJ, & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
....................................................... W.P.C. No. 12153 of 2013 - T ....................................................... Dated this the 9th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
Shaffique, J.
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking police protection alleging harassment by the 3 rd respondent. According to the petitioner the 3 rd respondent is a drunkard, a local goonda and he is unnecessarily causing harassment to the petitioner's daughter. An interim order has already been granted by this Court on 10-5-2014 directing the police to afford adequate and effective police protection to the life of the petitioner and her family members.
2. Learned Government Pleader submits that after the interim order has been passed appropriate action has been taken
W.P.C. No. 12153 of 2013 - T and as matters stand now, no untoward incident is reported.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interim order should be sustained. If at all there is any further threat from the 3 rd respondent, it is always open for the petitioner to approach the police, who shall look into the matter and act in accordance with law.
With the above observation, this Writ petition is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN , Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE ani/ /true copy/ P.S.to Judge