← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9541/2015dismissed

Maitheen v. Union Bank Of India

2015-05-25Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9541 of 2015 (P) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- MAITHEEN, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.HASSAN, EKKARAKUDIYIL, ADIMALI POST, ADIMALI, MANNANKANDAM, DEVIKULAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.T.SAJU SRI.MAITHEEN M.PAREETH RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MUNNAR BRANCH, IDUKKI- 685 612.

2. C.GUMNAMALLIKA, D/O.SUBBALAKSHMI, K.S.E.B QUARTERS NO.P.G.P.8/225, CHITHIRAPURAM, PALLIVASAL POST, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI. R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.S.P.KURUP, S.C, UBI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 9541 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 28.11.2012. EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAYER NOTICE DATED 24.11.2014. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 05.01.2015 FILED IN O.S.NO.05/2015, ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFFS' COURT, DEVIKULAM.

EXHIBIT P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 05.01.2015 PASSED IN I.A.NO.12 OF 2015 IN O.S NO.05/2015 OF THE MUNSIFFS' COURT, DEVIKULAM. EXHIBIT P5:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19.03.2015 GIVEN BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN C.M.P.NO.6055/2014. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.9541 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is seen that in spite of the undertaking given before this Court, the petitioner has not vacated the building. This Court as per order dated 21.5.2015, directed the petitioner to show cause why Contempt of Court be initiated against him. However, none appeared for the petitioner before this Court. Therefore, with a liberty to the respondent Bank to initiate any contempt proceedings against the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln