← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9681/2015disposed of

Robinson Chacko v. Union Of India

2015-03-264 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/5TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9681 of 2015 (I) --------------------------- PETITIONERS:

---------------------- 1.

ROBINSON CHACKO, TECHNICAL SUPERINTEDENT(PRODUCTION) CENTRAL PRODUCTS DAIRY MALABAR REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. (MRCMPU), NADUVATTOM, KOZHIKODE.

2.

JASMINE C.J., TECHNICAL OFFICER (PRODUCTION) MRCMPU LTD., PALAKKAD DAIRY, KALLEPULLY (PO) 3.

SIVARAMAKRISHNAN V.S., TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT (PRODUCTION) MRCMPU LTD., PALAKKAD DAIRY, KALLEPULLY (PO) 4.

SREELAKSHMI C.MENON DAIRY CHEMICST/DAIRY BACTERIOLOGIST MRCMPU LTD., PALAKKAD DAIRY, KALLEPULLY (PO) 5.

VIJAYAN K., TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT (ENGG) MRCMPU LTD., PALAKKAD DAIRY, KALLEPULLY (PO) 6.

SURESH V.P., ACCOUNTS OFFICER MRCMPU LTD., PALAKKAD DAIRY, KALLEPULLY (PO) 7.

PARAJEESHA P.P., DAIRY CHEMIST, MRCMPU LTD., WAYANAD DAIRY.

8.

TINTU V.GEORGE TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT MRCMPU LTD., WAYANAD DAIRY.

9.

HITHA ROSE PATRICK TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT MRCMPU LTD., WAYANAD DAIRY.

10.

SUBY BABU TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT MRCMPU LTD., KANNUR DAIRY.

11.

BALAKRISHNAN C., ACCOUNTS OFFICER MRCMPU LTD., KASARAGOD DAIRY ANANDASRAMAM (PO) KASARAGOD.

12.

ROBIN GEORGE ASSISTANT MARKETING OFFICER MRCMPU LTD., KASARAGOD DAIRY ANANDASRAMAM (PO) KASARAGOD.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.S.ARAVIND SRI.R.ROHITH SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

UNION OF INDIA (UOI) REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI 110 001.

2.

CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, HEAD OFFICE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110 066.

3.

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4.

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, ERANHIPALAM, KOZHIKODE 673 006.

5.

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION (EPFO), SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, VEEKEY COMPLEX, KANNUR 670 001.

6.

MALABAR REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS' UNION LTD HEAD OFFICE - PERINGALAM, KUNNAMANGALAM (PO) KOZHIKODE - 673 571 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. R1&2 BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL R6 BY SMT.LATHA KRISHNAN, SC R3 TO 5 BY SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C) NO.9681/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE SAID CIRCULAR NO.PENSION/MISC./2005 EXT.P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.2.2015 FORWARDED BY R6 TO THE R4.

EXT.P3 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ANOTHER LETTER DATED 27.2.2015 FOWARDED BY THE R6 TO THE R4.

EXT.P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE ANOTHER LETTER DT.4.3.2015 FORWARDED BY R6 TO R4 IN RESPECT OF PETITIONERS 6 TO 9. EXT.P5 : A TRUE COPY OF ANOTHER LETTER DATED 2.1.2015 FORWARDED BY R6 TO R5 IN RESPECT OF THE 10TH PETITIONER. EXT.P6 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.17.12.2014 FORWARDED BY R6 TO R5 IN RESPECT OF 11TH PETITIONER.

EXT.P7 : A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.2.2015 BY R6 TO R5 IN RESPECT OF THE 12TH PETITIONER.

EXT.P8 : A COMPARITIVE TABLE SHOWING DETAILS OF EACH OF THE PETITIONERS, THEIR EPF NOS. DATE OF JOINING SERVICE, DATES WHEN THEIR PAY EXCEEDED THE CEILING LIMIT ETC. EXT.P9 : A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.11.2014 IN WP(C) 28306/2014.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE dl/

V.CHITAMBARESH, J ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.9681 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The issue is covered by Ext.P9 judgment in W.P.(C) No.28306 of 2014. The directions therein will govern the case of the petitioners also. The petitioners shall be extended the benefits by the respondents accordingly. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE rkj //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE