← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/9953/2015disposed of

Vijayakumar v. The Secretary, Rta, Kollam

2015-03-273 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/6TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 9953 of 2015 (T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:

-------------------------- 1.

VIJAYAKUMAR, BABU VILASAM ARTHUNGAL, KADAKKAL 2.

VIMALAN, CHILAMPU KUMIL P.O., KOLLAM 3.

ANILKUMAR, BABU VILASAM ARTHUNGAL, KADAKKAL 4.

SAJEER, CHERUKONATHU VEEDU ANAPPARA P.O., KADAKKAL BY ADV. SRI.STALIN PETER DAVIS RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM, PIN - 673 307 2.

VIMAL RAJ, RAJ BHAVAN, PEZHUMMOODU, VALAVUPACHA, KADAKKAL - 691 536 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 9953 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS ISSUING TEMPORARY PERMIT BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 23.2.2015 EXHIBIT-P2- A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 25.02.2015 EXHIBIT-P3- A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 25.02.2015 EXHIBIT-P4- A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 25.02.2015 EXHIBIT-P5- A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 25.02.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 9953 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners object to the time slot alloted to the second respondent to operate the stage carriage service. It is alleged that a temporary permit has been issued to the second respondent without settlement of timings.

2.

Exts. P2 to P5 objections filed by the petitioners are pending. I direct the first respondent to consider Exts. P2 to P5 objections with notice to the petitioners as well as the second respondent. The needful shall be done within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE