High Court of KeralaWP(C)/10144/2015disposed of

T.P.Abraham v. M/S. Indus Motors

2015-10-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10144 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- T.P.ABRAHAM, S/O.POULOSE, AGED 74 YEARS, THOPPIL HOUSE, CHADAYAMANGALAM, KOLLAM-691534.

BY ADV. SRI.DENIZEN KOMATH RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. M/S. INDUS MOTORS, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.

2. ANEESH KADAKKAL, C/O.INDUS MOTORS, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-4.

3. M/S MARUTHI SUZUKI INDIA LTD, NELSON MANDELA ROAD, VASANTH KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110010.

4. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER(EDAPPALLY) R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 10144 of 2015 (P) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN C.C.61/2007 DATED 16-8-2012.

EXT.P2 : TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN APPEAL NO.931/12.

EXT.P3 :

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION NO.98/2013. EXT.P4 :

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVIEW PETITION RP 59/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,CHALLENGING EXT.P2.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 10144 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The only prayer of the petitioner before this Court is that the 4th respondent-State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commmission, Thiruvananthapuram shall complete the proceedings for execution in C.C.No.61/2007 as expeditiously as possible.

Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 4th respondent-State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to complete the execution proceedings within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner as well as judgment debtors. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr