A.Abdul Samad v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/9TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10176 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- 1.

A.ABDUL SAMAD, VALIYAVILA VEEDU, AKM MOTORS, ALAMCODE, ATTINGAL.

2.

K.M.SALIM, JANATHA HOUSE, ALAMCODE P.O., ATTINGAL.

3.

TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT PRIVATE BUS OPERATORS ASSOCIATION, AKM BUILDING, AMC, 1/403, KOCHUVILA, ALAMCODE P.O., ATTINGAL, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY B.KARIRAJAN.

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL, PIN - 695 101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 10176 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT ISSUING TIMINGS FOR THE 1ST PETITIONER'S SERVICE DTD.22.4.2014. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT ISSUING TIMINGS FOR THE 2ND PETITIONER'S SERVICE DTD.17.5.2012. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT DTD.24.2.2015. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER DTD.4.11.2011.

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WP(C) NO.2844 OF 2013 DTD.21.11.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.10176 of 2015 - V ====================== Dated this the 30th day of March, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The only grievance in the writ petition is that Order No. D3/875/STA/2005 (D3 Circular) dated 8.11.2011 is not being implemented in a uniform manner as per the directions issued by this Court at Ext.P5 judgment.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that, the implementation is also going on in a phased manner and the directions in the judgment will be complied with. In such circumstance, the writ petition is found to be unnecessary and the writ petition would stand closed. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge