T.K.Surendran v. The Revenue Divisional Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10203 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ T.K.SURENDRAN, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. KUNJUPANICKEN THEKKETHODATHINETH SURENDRA BHAVAN, KODAIKKAD MURI, CHRIYANADU VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, PIN-690509 BY ADV. SRI.N.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENTS :
-----------------------
1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, CHENGANNUR PIN-689121
2. THE TAHSILDAR TALUK OFFICE, CEHNGANNUR PIN-689121
3. THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR PIN-689121
4. PANKAJAKSHI, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O.GOPI, THEKKETHODATHINETH, KADIKKAD MURI, CHERIYANADU VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, PIN-690509 R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN R4 BY ADV. SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 10203 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:- TRUE COPY OF RE-SURVEY PLAN OF FIELD NO 375 IN BLOCK, NO 11 OF CHERIYANDU VILLAGE.
P2:- TRUE COPY OF LETTER DTD 20/1/2015 ISSUED BY IST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P3:- TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DTD 10/3/2015 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
P4:- TRUE COPY OF PLAINT IN OS NO 79/2013 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHENGANNUR.
P5:- TRUE COPY OF WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO 79/2013 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHENGANNUR RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE bp
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 10203 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 26th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached the revenue officials to demarcate and fix the boundary of the property belongs to him. The 4th respondent herein has filed a suit for fixation of boundary before the Munsiff Court, Chengannur as O.S No.79/2013. The petitioner approached this Court on account of delay in taking steps to fix the boundary by the revenue officials. 2.
It is now agreed by both parties, if the demarcation and fixation is done through the civil court, they have no objection in concluding the issue. In such a circumstances this Court is of the view that the civil suit pending before the Munsiff Court, Chengannur in O.S No.79/2013 shall be concluded before 31.3.2016.
The writ petition is disposed of. All the proceedings of the revenue officials shall therefore be dropped. sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
- : 2 :-