High Court of KeralaWP(C)/10219/2015closed

S.Prasad v. Kollam District Co Operative Bank Limited

2015-06-25Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/4TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10219 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- S.PRASAD, VADAKKEKALILAZHIKATHU VEEDU, EDUVAICODE, NEDUMANCAVU P.O.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KOLLAM DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED., REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HEAD OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691 001.

2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, KOLLAM - 691 001.

3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, KAREEPRA BRANCH, KOLLAM - 691 552.

BY SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR, SC, KOLLAM DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 10219 of 2015 (B) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.HL 66 DATED 15.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT EXT.P-2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 13(2) NO.REC/V/201 8117 DATED 21.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT EXT.P-3:

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S WIFE BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.10219 of 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Bank submits that, the petitioner has closed the account after remitting the entire amount. This submission is recorded. In view of the above, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the petitioner to approach this Court for reopening the matter, if the version put forth from the part of the respondent Bank is contrary to the actual facts and figures. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.