Vipin.E.V. v. The East Eleri Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/16TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No.14015 of 2012 (B) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- VIPIN.E.V,S/O.VINCENT,AGED 25 YEARS, EDAKKAROT HOUSE,CHITTARIKKAL P.O.,HOSDURG TALUK. BY ADV.SRI.SUNNY MATHEW RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE EAST ELERI SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. P.O.CHITTARIKKAL,KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-671326.

2.

THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KASARAGOD-671326.

R1 BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.BABU SMT.N.SUDHA SRI.K.S.GOPI SRI.A.STHOMAS SMITH SRI.ANTONEY MATHEW SRI.GEEN T.MATHEW SRI.BABU SHANKAR SRI.VIPIN VISWAN R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

pk

W.P(C) NO.14015/2012 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 4.5.2012 PUBLISHED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2:TRUE COPY OF THE INTERVIEW CARD ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXT.P3:TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 8.6.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.R1(a):TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.79/2011 DATED 9.11.2011 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 14015 of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

This writ petition relates to the participation of the petitioner for an interview scheduled to be held on 16.06.2012.

2.

This Court, by interim order dated 15.06.2012, has ordered that the selection would be provisional and subject to the result of the writ petition.

3.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that the interview was conducted and the petitioner did not participate in the interview, and therefore, he was not selected.

As the writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition is closed without examining the merits. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-