High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14018/2012disposed of

Saji v. Vamanapuram Grama Panchayath

2015-03-10Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/19TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C). No.14018 of 2012 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SAJI, S/O.DAMODARAN PILLAI, AGED 40, KAVUVILA VEEDU, VAMANAPURAM P.O., NEDUMANGAD TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. VAMANAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAMANAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 606.

2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VENJARAMOODU POLICE STATION, VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 607.

3. RAVI, RESHMA STORE, VAMANAPURAM PARK JUNCTION VAMANAPURAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695606. R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI RAFEEK V.K.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C). No.14018 of 2012 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:- EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 7-9-2011 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL KRJ /True Copy/ P.A to Judge

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.14018 of 2012 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the first respondent to dispose of Ext.P1 representation within a time frame.

2. The petitioner is the resident of Vamanapuram at Thiruvananthapuram. According to the petitioner, to reach his house, he has to travel through Vamanapuram Park Junction-Karuvay Elyi road. He alleges that the said road is having a width of only two metres. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent took 4 rooms on rent for conducting a go-down. He parks the goods vehicles coming to his shop on the two metres' width road making vehicular traffic through the same impossible.

3. The petitioner filed representation before respondents 1 and

2. However, no action has been taken on the same so far. According to the petitioner, he filed the representation before the first

WP(C)14018/12 -:2:- respondent. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

4. Considering the limited prayer in this writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj