Nazeer A v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/9TH CHAITHRA, 1937 ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- NAZEER A., M/S.S.A.K. TRADERS, VALAVUPACHA, CHITHARA, KADAKKAL, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. DR.K.P.PRADEEP.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO TAXES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER-1, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ANCHAL, KOLLAM.
3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ASRAMAM, KOLLAM-691 002.
4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, TALUK OFFICE, KOTTARAKKARA.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO.32021473803/2011-12 DATED 30/12/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P1A COPY OF THE PENALTY ORDER NO.32021473803/2012-13 DATED 05/01/2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 25/03/2015 FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 FILED BY THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO EXT.P1 ORDER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2A COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 25/03/2015 FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 FILED BY THE PETITIONER WITH RESPECT TO EXT.P1A ORDER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P2 APPEAL DATED 25/03/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3A COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION IN EXT.P2A REVISION DATED 25/03/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION IN EXT.P2 APPEAL DATED 25/03/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4A COPY OF THE STAY PETITION IN EXT.P2A APPEAL DATED 25/03/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.D5-6780/15 DATED 17/03/2015 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE RR ACT.
EXT.P5A COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.D5-6779/15 DATED 17/03/2015 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE RR ACT.
........2/-
EXT.P6 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.D5-6780/15 DATED 17/03/2015 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2011-12 UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE RR ACT.
EXT.P6A COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE NO.D5-6779/15 DATED 17/03/2015 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 UNDER SECTION 34 OF THE RR ACT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.10349 OF 2015 (P) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of March, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Against Ext.P1 series of assessment orders under the KVAT Act, the petitioner had preferred Ext.P2 series of appeals before the 3rd respondent. Along with the appeals, the petitioner had also preferred Ext.P3 series of delay condonation petitions and Ext.P4 series of stay petitions before the 3rd respondent. It is the case of the petitioner that even prior to considering the stay petitions, recovery steps are taken by the respondents through Ext.P5 series and Ext.P6 series of demand notices as confirmed by Ext.P1 series of assessment orders.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:
W.P.(C).No.10349/2015
1. The 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 series of delay condonation petitions and Ext.P4 series of stay petitions within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.
2.Recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner pursuant to Ext.P1 series of assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance till orders are passed by the 3rd respondent as directed above and communicated to the petitioner.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp