S.Krishnakumar v. Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10385 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ S.KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 37 YEARS PARTNER, RAJAMURUGAN FINANCE, 160/1 G.R.COMPLEX, GROUND FLOOR, THEPPAKULAM STREET OPP. OLD BUS STAND, TIRUCHENGODE-637211.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PALAKKAD-678001.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KONGAD, PALAKKAD-678001.

3. SRI.SAJITH S/O.SWAMINATHAN, CHERUNGAL HOUSE, ANIKODE KARIYAMKODE P.O., PALAKKAD-678512.

R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 10385 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-8 W 9300 EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE HIRE PURCHASE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 22.12.2014 EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 13.3.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE JJJ

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 10385 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 9th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, C.J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader as well.

2.

By this Writ Petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to afford adequate and effective protection to the life and properties of the petitioner from the 3rd respondent.

3.

The petitioner claims to have extended finance to the 3rd respondent regarding the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-8 W 9300. The petitioner submits that he is a partner of the Finance Company operating from the State of Tamil Nadu and he is being threatened by the 3rd respondent, with regard to which complaints have been filed as Exts.P3 and P4.

W.P.(C) No.10385/2015 -24.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date there is no award for repossessing the vehicle. 5.

Insofar as any offence or attempt to offence against the petitioner is committed, it shall be open for the petitioner to submit appropriate complaint before the Sub Inspector concerned, who shall look into the same and take appropriate action.

With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

jjj