Sree Narayana Institute Of Technology v. District Police Chief, Pathanamthitta

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/25TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10664 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------- SREE NARAYANA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CONDUCTED BY PATTAYIL KUNJU KUNJU MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST THEEPUPARA P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA - 691 554 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

BY ADVS.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.PAUL JACOB (P) SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL SMT.TINA ALEX THOMAS SRI.S.SREEDEV SRI.RONY JOSE RESPONDENTS:-:

-------------

1. DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, PATHANAMTHITTA - 691 554.

2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ADOOR - 691 523.

4. GOKUL P., MALASSERIL, ANANDAPALLY P.O., ADOOR - 691 523.

5. KHAYIS IBIN SUBAIR, KHAYIS IBIN SUBAIR, PLAMTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, THONNALLOOR PANDALAM P.O. - 689 501.

6. AKHIL OMANAKUTTAN, THAIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KAKKAZHOM P.O.

AMBALAPPUZHA - 688 005.

7. BADUSH N., MEKKE MUNDAPPALLIL, PADA NORTH, KARUNAGAPPALLY P.O. KOLLAM - 690 518.

8. DIPIN P. KUTTAN, THETTIYOTTU VEEDU, MARANAD P.O., EZHUKONE KOLLAM - 691 505.

9. HAREESH KUMAR S.G., PUTHEN VEEDU, NEAR NCC OFFICE, MYTHRI NAGAR KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506.

10. ABY ABRAHAM BHASKER, SARANAM, NEDUMPAIKULAM, KUNDARA P.O.

KOLLAM - 691 501.

R8-R10 BY ADV. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS R4-R7 BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL R4-R7 BY ADV. SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR R4-R7 BY ADV. SMT.V.BEENA BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ. & K. RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

.................................................. W.P.(C).No.10664 of 2014 ....................................................... Dated this the 16th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, CJ.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. The submission is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

S/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

cl /true copy/ P.S to Judge