K.G.Gopalakrishna Panicker v. The Kaduthuruthy Grama Panchayat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2015/10TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10481 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
K.G.GOPALAKRISHNA PANICKER, AGED 69, S/O GOPALA PANICKER, KIZHAKKEDATHU HOUSE, KADUTHURUTHY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JOBI JOSE KONDODY RESPONDENTS:
1. THE KADUTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KADUTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, KADUTHURUTHY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 604.
2. THE SECRETARY, KADUTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, KADUTHURUTHY P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 604.
3. THE REVENUE DISVIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 575.
4. THE CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED UNDER ACT 28 OF 2008), THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, KADUTHURUTHY P.O.
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 604.
5. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE OFFICE, KADUTHURUTHY P.O.
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 604.
BY SPL. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P.K.SOYUZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX IN WPC 10481/2015 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT. P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 21.04.2012 EXECUTED BETWEEN SMT.BHARGAVI AMMA AND LEKHA BIJI WITH THE PETITIONER EXT. P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIXED DEPOSIT RECEIPT DATED 19.04.20123 EVIDENCING THE DEPOSIT IN FAVOUR OF THE MINOR AS DIRECTRED BY THE DIDSTRICT COURT, KOTTAYAM IN OP (G&W) 17/2012 EXT. P3 PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HOUSE IN THE PROPERTY COVERED VIDE EXT. P1 EXT. P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 24.05.1997 BY WHICH BABU SOLD THE PROPERTY TO RATNAMMA EXT. P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED EXECUTED BETWEEN SMT.RATNAMMA AND MR.BIJI P.NAIR ON 27.05.2008 EXT. P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 01.09.2011 FIXING THE FAIR VALUE OF LAND IN KOTTAYAM DISTRICT UNDER RULE 5(8) OF THE KERALA STAMP (FIXATION OF FAIR VALUE OF LAND) RULES, 1995 EXT. P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 05.07.
2014 ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER FOR PRODUCING IT BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT EXT. P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXT. P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.01.2015 IN WPC 34087/14 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT EXT. P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.01.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FOURTH RESPONDENT EXT. P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 30.01.2015 EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P10 REPRESENTATION EXT. P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, VAIKOM TO THE PETITIONER DATEDF 31.01.2015 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.
------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.10481 of 2015 I -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31st day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
Earlier, based on the direction of this Court in Exhibit P9 judgment dated 15.01.2015, the petitioner filed Exhibit P10 representation before the fourth respondent for correction of the data bank entries regarding his property. Complaining of what is said to be delay on the part of the fourth respondent in considering Exhibit P10, the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. As can be seen from the record, Exhibit P9 judgment was rendered on 15.01.2015 and the petitioner submitted Exhibit P10 representation on 28.01.2015, delay, if it can be called, cannot be termed as inordinate.
3. At any rate, this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's
WPC 10481/15 Exhibit P10 representation in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv