Symenson Patric Bivera v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/25TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20867 of 2005 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
1. SYMENSON PATRIC BIVERA, S/O. PHILIP BIVERA, AGED 37, LINEMAN GRADE I, VADUTHALA ELECTRIC SECTION, BIVERA COTTAGE, VADUTHALA, KOCHI-23.
2. SONEY T.D., LINEMAN GRADE-I, VADUTHALA ELECTRIC SECTION, RESIDING AT THOTTAKATH HOUSE, ELOOR FERRY ROAD, MANNANTHURUTHU, VARAPUZHA.
3. SUNILKUMAR K.M., LINEMAN GRADE-I, BRAHMAPURAM DIESEL POWER PLANT, RESIDING AT ODIPPATTIL PARAMBIL HOUSE, UNICHIRA, B.M.C. P.O.
4. K.N. MANOJ KUMAR, LINEMAN GRADE-I, BRAHMAPURAM DIESEL POWER PLANT, RESIDING AT KLIKTHURUTHIL HOUSE, CHATHARY, VYMEETHY, THRIPUNITHURA.
5. JOSEPH N.X., LINEMAN GRADE-I, ELECTRICAL SECTION, THRIKKAKARA, RESIDING AT NADUVILA MANAKKAL HOUSE, SOUTH CHITTOOR.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR, SRI.S. JAYAPAL MENON.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY (ELECTRICITY), GOVT. SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
2. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM.
WP(C).No. 20867 of 2005 (H)
3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.LILLY LESLIE.
R2 BY ADVS. SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM, SENIOR SC, KSEB, SRI.S.SHARAN, SC, K.S.E.B, SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
==================== W.P. (C) No. 20867 of 2005 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 16th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The challenge in this writ petition is against the appointment to the post of meter readers in the Kerala State Electricity Board.
2.
The contention is that 40% of vacancies of meter readers are set apart for appointment of qualified in-service candidates. However, no such appointments had been made in Ernakulam District. Though, the writ petition was filed on 11.07.2005, no interim orders were issued. By efflux of time, the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge