High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14582/2012dismissed as infructuous

Neena Jose v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-19Honourable Mr.Justice K.Harilal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/28TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 14582 OF 2012 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------- NEENA JOSE, AGED 35 YEARS, D/O.REMMY JOSE, 8E, CAMPAIGN APARTMENTS EDAPPALLY-24.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.A.CHACKO SMT.C.M.CHARISMA RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERALEDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. COUNCIL FOR INDIAN SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATIONS (CISCE), REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND SECRETARY, PRAGATI HOUSE, 3RD FLOOR, 47-48 NEHRU PALACE, NEW DELHI-110019.

3. THE INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL(TIPS), COCHIN CAMPUS, EDACHIRA, KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.

4. THE INDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL(TIPS), REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, TIPS COIMBATORE MAIN, 193 SATHY ROAD, SS KULAM.P.O, COIMBATORE-641107.

5. KALABHAVAN EDUCATION TRUST, KALABHAVAN BUILDING, ERNAKULAM NORTH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER-682018.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.V.RAJA R3-R5 BY ADV. SRI.ANIL D. NAIR R3-R5 BY ADV. SRI.J.R.PREM NAVAZ R3-R5 BY ADV. SMT.NIVEDITA A.KAMATH BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. V.K. RAFEEK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DST

K. HARILAL, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P. (C) No.14582 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 19 th day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Writ Petition challenging the enhancement of school fees during the period from 2012 to 2013 and the matter has become infructuous.

Going by the averments in this Writ Petition also, it is seen that this Writ Petition is filed challenging enhancement of school fees under Exts.P2 and P4 for the period 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Having regard to the grievance projected in this Writ Petition, as rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent, I find that the matter in issue has become infructuous, by

W.P.(C) No. 14582 of 2012 -: 2 :- the lapse of time.

In the above view, this Writ Petition will stand as dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- K. HARILAL, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge