High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11059/2014dismissed as infructuous

Rajeeb S.A. v. Regional Transport Officer, Ernakulam

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 11059 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RAJEEB S.A. AGED 32 YEARS S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, SAITHUKUDY HOUSE, EDATHALA P.O. ERNAKULAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.JITHESH MENON SMT.K.INDU (POURNAMI) RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, ERNAKULAM [LICENSING AUTHORITY], ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION KAKKANAD, KOCHI-30.

2. THE DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER CENTRAL ZONE-II, ERNAKULAM. 682 030

3. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER TRANSPORT COMMISSIONARATE, TRANS TOWER, VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

R1-R3 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 11059 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 9-11-2013. EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DATED 13-11-2013.

EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CASUE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13-11-2013.

EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY TO THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 18-11-2013.

EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13-11-2013. EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13-11-2013 WHICH WAS SIGNED FOR COMMUNICATION ON 18-11-2013. EXHIBIT P7TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 11059 of 2014 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

In the circumstance of the period of suspension of driving license being already over, this Court would not consider the issues raised, since the question raised would be purely academic. However, the contention shall be left open. This Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj