High Court of KeralaWP(C)/10864/2015disposed of

Abdu Rahman v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-28Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2015/6TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 10864 of 2015 (G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ABDU RAHMAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.KUMMALI KUNHI MUHAMMED, KUMMALI HOUSE, 5/233 C, VANDOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM - 679 339.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, NILAMBUR TALUK, NILAMBUR, MALAPPURAM - 679 330.

3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VANDOOR VILLAGE, VANDOOR, MALAPPURAM - 679 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 10864 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF THE JENM DEED NO.2406/2014 OF SRO VANDOOR EXECUTED BY ONE BALAKRISHNAN AND NISAMUDHEEN. EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE COPY PURCHASE CERTIFICATE ISSUED IN FAVOUR OF KOTTAMMAL THANDUPARAKKAL SAHEER ALI BEARING NO.207/2013 DATED 23.11.2012.

EXT.P-3: TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 23.1.2013. EXT.P-4: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 4.3.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.10864 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P4 representation for mutation and for acceptance of basic tax. An application was in fact, earlier filed, which has not been considered, upon which, the above representation has been filed.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits that there is some dispute with respect to the exemption claimed on the basis of the nature of the property which is said to be plantation. The learned Government Pleader submits that some time may be granted for verification of the same and considering the application. In such circumstance, the 2nd respondent shall consider the same and pass written orders, in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Sd/ (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge