High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11071/2015disposed of

Radhagopal Dath v. Regional Transportauthority

2015-04-06Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/16TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11071 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RADHAGOPAL DATH, KALEEKKAL HOUSE, GOVINDAMUTOM P.O., KAYAMKULAM, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR, SRI.T.P.SAJAN.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 001.

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688 001.

3. DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, ALAPPUZHA-688 001.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR. R3 BY ADVS. SRI.P.C.CHACKO, SC.

SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 11071 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 02/06/2014 OF THE PETITIONER FOR GRANT OF REGULAR PERMIT.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE RTA DATED 19/12/2014 ADJOURNING THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER FOR GRANT OF REGULAR PERMIT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

K. Vinod Chandran, J.

==================================== W.P.(C)No.11071 of 2015 ==================================== Dated this the 6th day of April, 2015.

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of a regular permit application, which, according to him, was submitted on 2.6.2014. The non-consideration, admittedly, is on the ground of the report of the Field Officer, having not been received. Petitioner submits that now the report has been filed before the Authority. It is also submitted that a meeting is scheduled on 17.4.2015. If the said application is not posted in the said meeting, then, at least in the next meeting, the same shall be scheduled and considered by the Authority.

Writ petition is disposed off.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

sl.