High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11144/2015disposed of

Anil Kumar v. The Village Officer

2015-09-22Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11144 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- ANIL KUMAR S/O. RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 35 YEARS PAPPANKATTIL HOUSE, PANAYOOR DESOM KOONATHARA AMSOM, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PIN-679 522.

BY ADV. SRI.C.DILIP RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER VANIYAMKULAM 1 KOONATHARA VILLAGE, VANIYAMKULAM P.O. OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679 522.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN-679 101.

R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 11144 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P1.

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF SALE DEED NO. 473/2014 OF SRO, OTTAPALAM DATED 30-01-2014.

EXT.P2.

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF SALE DEED NO. 2778/2013 OF SRO, OTTAPALAM DATED 17-7-2013.

EXT.P3.

TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 08-01-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT FOR EFFECTING MUTATION.

EXT.P4.

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 21-02-2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

---------------------------------------- W.P(C)No. 11144 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner claims to be the owner of 2.53 ares of land in Sy.No.128/1 of Vaniyamkulam I Koonathara Village in Ottappalam Taluk. The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by the refusal in effecting transfer of registry in his favour by Ext.P1 sale deed.

2. In the impugned order, the Village Officer has stated that due to the pendency of civil suit filed by another person, nothing can be done. This Court is of the view that the second respondent shall take appropriate decision in the matter, after hearing the petitioner as well as the parties to the civil suit O.S.No.96/2011 filed before the civil court within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after notice to all the affected parties. This writ petition is disposed of as above.

sd/- MBS/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE,Judge.

CRL.A.NO.

:-2-: