The Manager, Krkpmbhs & Vhss, Kadampanad v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/21ST KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14923 of 2012 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ THE MANAGER, K.R.KRISHNA PILLAI MEMORIAL BOYS HIGH SCHOOL & VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KADAMPANAD - 691 553.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD SRI.C.JOSEPH JOHNY RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014.

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONL OFFICER, KOTTARAKKARA - 691 506.

4. SMT.REMYA R., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(MATHS), K.R.KRISHNA PILLAI MEMORIAL BOYS HIGH SCHOOL & VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KADAMPANAD - 691 553.

R1 TO R3 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.E.M.ABDUL KHADIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 14923 of 2012 (M) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTING ORDER DATED 1-6-2010. EXHIBIT P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF CHANGE OF STAFF. EXHIBIT P3:

THE TRUE COPY RELEVANT PAGES CONTAINING THE ORDER NO.H2/35920/2011 DPI DATED NIL OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.7.2012 IN WP(C)NO.15008/2011 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.14923 of 2012 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of November 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the 3rd respondent to grant approval of the appointment of the 4th respondent as High School Assistant (Maths). 2.

During the pendency of the writ petition, the educational authorities have approved the appointment of the 4th respondent with effect from 01/06/2011. According to the petitioner, the approval ought to have been made with effect from 01/06/2010.

3.

Be that as it may, since orders have already been passed, I do not think that any further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition.

Reserving the right of the petitioner to make their surviving claim before the competent authorities, this writ petition is disposed of.

(sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr