← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11178/2015disposed of

Manoj v. Senapathy Grama Panchayat

2015-05-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2015/31ST VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11178 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- MANOJ, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.MATHEW, KANJIRATHANKUNNEL HOUSE, KUTHUMKAL KANTHIPPARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK IDUKKI DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. SENAPATHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, SENAPATHY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 586.

2. THE SECRETARY, SENAPATHY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, SENAPATHY P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 586.

3. STENSILAVOS, AGED 53, S/O.PHILIP, KODAKALLUMKAL HOUSE, KUTHUMKAL KANTHIPPARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK IDUKKI DISTRICT.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 11178 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO. 86/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, DEVIKULAM.

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S NO. 91/2015 OF MUNSIFF COURT, DEVEKULAM.

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A NO. 282/2015 DATED 11-03-2015. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.P4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT SHOWING RECEIPT OF THE EXT.P4 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 11178 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has come up before this Court alleging that the 2nd respondent is not taking any action on Ext.P4 representation.

2.

Though notice has been served on the respondent panchayath, the respondent has not turned up.

3.

When the matter came up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner confined his argument to the limited prayer for a direction to respondents 1 & 2 to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 within a time frame.

In the light of the submission, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents 1 & 2 to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 after affording the petitioner and the affected parties, if any, an opportunity

W.P.(C) No. 11178 of 2015 ..2..

of being heard, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent concerned at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-