Abraham Varkey v. District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/4TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13862 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- ABRAHAM VARKEY, EDACHERIKUNNEL, PARIYARAM P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.PAUL JACOB (P) SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM - 686002.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM - 686002.
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD ROAD DIVISION, KOTTAYAM - 686002.
4. TAHSILDHAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM - 686002.
5. VILLAGE OFFICER, PUTHUPALLY, KOTTAYAM - 686011.
6. KRISHNAN ACHARI, IYYADDIYIL, PARIYARAM P.O., PUTHUPALLY, KOTTAYAM-686021.
R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAFEEK V.K. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 13862 of 2013 (G) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.19.11.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE LOCAL PUBLIC TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.17.01.2013 AND NUMBERED AS F1(1)- 16082/12 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.25.02.2013 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTTER DTD.01.04.2013 AND NUMBER AS NO.347/12 ISSUED BY THE 5TH REPONDENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED RELATING TO THE 3 CENTS IN RE.SY.NO.184/11 IN BLOCK 37 OF PUTHUPALLY VILLAGE OWNED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P7: TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING THE ENCROACHMENT BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------------------
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
========================= W.P.(C) No.13862 of 2013 ============================ Dated this the 25th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that the matter has become infructuous as the prayer of the petitioner has been complied with by the respondent. Therefore, the petition is closed as infructuous. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI (JUDGE) vdv //True Copy// P.A to Judge