Muhammed Ali N.P v. The Additional Tahsildar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/17TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11301 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
--------------------- MUHAMMED ALI N.P., S/O. KUNJIKUTTY HAJI RESIDING AT NEDUMPARAMBIL HOUSE PONMUNDAM P.O., TIRUR TALUK MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE AND POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHAKEELA.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.HARIHARAN SRI.PRAVEEN H.
RESPONDENT(S) :
---------------------------- 1.
THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR TIRUR TALUK, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN - 676 106.
2.
THE VILLAGE OFFICER PONMUNDAM VILLAGE, PONMUNDAM TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT PIN - 676 106.
R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 11301 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 2153/92 OF SRO, KALPAKANCHERRY. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT NO. 8498553 DATED 18.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PONMUNDAM IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED IN FORM NO. 10 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR POINTING OUT THE BOUNDARIES OF THE REGISTERED LANDS DATED 11.2.2015.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
======================== W.P.(C). No. 11301 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ commanding the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application filed by the petitioner under Rule 43 of the Kerala Survey and Boundary Rules without any further delay.
ii. To pass such other reliefs, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has also been highlighted by way of Ext.P3 application which is pending consideration before the 1st respondent and the prayer is only to cause the same to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. In view of the limited relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 in accordance with law after
W.P.C. No. 11301 of 2015 -2giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties, if any, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for further steps.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
kp/-