Matha Vineetha Jacob v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11307 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONER:
----------- MATHA VINEETHA JACOB AGED 33 YEARS, WIFE OF M.J. LAWRENCE, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL ASSISTANT, ST.JOSEPH'S LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PAVARATTY, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:
------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE - 680 003.
4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MULLASSERY, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 509.
5. THE MANAGER, CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, ARCH DIOCESE OF THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680001.
6. THE HEADMASTER, ST.JOSEPH'S LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PAVARATTY, CHAVAKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 507.
7. THE HEADMASTER, ST.MARY'S UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, LOURDES THRISSUR 680 546.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER: SMT.A.LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11307 of 2015 (K) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS --------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 16.7.2009 EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 18.8.2010 EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 13.6.2012 EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(RT)NO.5272/2014/G.EDN. DATED 26.11.2014 OF THE GOVERNMENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------- //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE rsr
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR. J.
-------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 11307 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner who was appointed as LPSA, against separate leave vacancies, by Exts. P1 and P2 appointment orders, thereafter worked against a regular vacancy pursuant to Ext. P3 appointment order. In the writ petition, he is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent Educational Authority in granting approval to the appointment covered by Exts. P1 and P2 appointment orders. The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to grant approval to the appointments covered by Exts. P1 and P2 appointment orders, in tune with Ext. P4 Government Order. When the matter came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader took time to get instructions in the matter.
Today, when the matter came up for order, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader on instructions that orders have been passed by the respondents approving the appointments covered by Exts. P1 and P2 appointment orders, in accordance with the directions in Ext.P4 Government Order. Copies of the approval orders were also made available before this court.
-2W.P.(C). No. 11307 of 2015 to the appointments covered by Exts. P1 and P2. Under the circumstances, the writ petition is closed recording the submission of the learned Government Pleader.
Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE rsr