P U Ramadas v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/17TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11314 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
------------- P U RAMADAS, AGED 28 YEARS SON OF UNNIKRISHNAN NAMBOODIRI, JUNIOR SANSKRIT TEACHER (PART -TIME), R.P.M.M.U.P.SCHOOL, EDAKKAZHIYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION JAGATHY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE 680 003.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 506.
5. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 506.
6. THE MANAGER, R.P.M.M.U.P.SCHOOL, EDAKKAZHIYUR, VIA CHAVAKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680 515.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER (SR): ADV.SRI.V. VIJULAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11314 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------ EXT P1-TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 22.6.2011 OF THE PETITIONER EXT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C.2017/11/K/DIS DATED 14.6.12 ISSUED BY TEH ASST.EDL.OFFICER EXT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B1-6317/12/K.DIS DATED 5.10.12 OF THE DIST .EDL.OFFICER EXT P4- TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.10.2011 OF THE PETITIONER EXT P5- TRUE COPY OF HTE ORDER NO.F2-85277/2014/D.P.I/K.DIS DATED 28.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR EXT P6- TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 18.3.2015 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITHOUT ANNEXURE EXT P7- TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 18.3.2015 FILED ALONG WITH EXT.P6 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL True Copy/ P A to Judge
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
========================= W.P(C).No.11314 of 2015 ============================ Dated this the 07th day of April, 2015
JUDGMENT
Petitioner approached the Government by Ext.P6 revision challenging Ext.P5 order passed by the Director of Higher Secondary Education. Petitioner claims that he is also entitled for approval with effect from the date of appointment. In Ext.P5, there was also a direction to recover the excess salary paid to the petitioner as petitioner was only eligible for approval on daily wages.
2.
In view of pendency of Ext.P6 before the Government, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P6 after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and management concerned within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such decision is taken in the matter, entire recovery pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
Sbna/07/04/15