C.R. Rahulan v. Commissioner For Rural Development

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/20TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15348 of 2010 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- C.R. RAHULAN EDAMUTTAM P.O., S.N.CENTRE, THRISSUR (RETIRED BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PONNANI BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT).

BY ADVS.SRI.C.ANILKUMAR (KALLESSERIL) SRI.C.Y.VINOD KUMAR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR RURAL, DEVELOPMENT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (KERALA), OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (KERALA) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

R, BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. S. JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-092015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15348 of 2010 (P) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO RD1/ 125/08 DT 23.05.2008 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 4389/009 DT 10.02.2009 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 11.10.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 28.07.2010 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF the CHALAN RECEIPT DT 4.9.2010 SHOWING REMITTANCE OF THE PENALTY AMOUNT BY THE PETITIONER EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DT 26.08.2010 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESOPNDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER ON 20.09.2010 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 15348 of 2010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has filed the aforesaid writ petition claiming retirement benefits including pension and annual increments withheld and arrears of salary. The entire retirement benefits are said to have been paid. However, the annual increments withheld have not been paid since allegedly the probation has not been declared. In such circumstance, the petitioner can make appropriate representations before the authority. Leaving open such remedy, the writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/=- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge