High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15134/2008dismissed as infructuous

P.Ramanan v. State Of Kerala

2015-11-11Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/20TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15134 of 2008 (B) -------------------------------------- PETITIONERS : - -----------------------

1. P.RAMANAN, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.PAPPU (LATE), THEKKEVILA HOUSE, EDAMULAKKAL, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

2. S.SAJEEV, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O.SASIKUMAR, KAVIYODU HOUSE, KOTTAKKAL P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

3. D.BIJUMON, AGED 26 YEARS,S/O.DAMODHARAN, CHERUMALA PUTHENVEEDU, ALINERA KARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4. J.SUSEELAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.JACOB, SINDU MANDIRAM, IDAMULAKKAL VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN RESPONDENTS : - --------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, TAXES (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE ASST.EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM.

4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KOTTARAKKARA.

5. THE KOTTARAKKARA TALUK MADHYA VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI UNION (CITU), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. THE KOTTARAKKARA TALUK MADHYA VYAVASAYA CHETHU THOZHILALI UNION (CITU), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

WP(C).No. 15134 of 2008 (B) --------------------------------------

7. KOTTARAKKARA-CHADAYAMANGALAM RANGE CHETHU THOZHILALI UNION (AITUC), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

8. THE KOTTARAKKARA TALUK MADHYA VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI UNION (AITUC), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

R1-R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DMR/-

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 15134 of 2008 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners reports that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-