Shantha v. The Superintendent Of Police(Rural)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11862 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS :

-------------------

1. SHANTHA, AGED 67 YEARS,W/O.KUMARAN, PUTHENPRACKAL HOUSE, KAIPPOORIKKARA KARA, VAZHAKKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. SARIN M. SUDHAKARAN, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O. SUDHAKARAN, PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, KAIPPOORIKKARA KARA, VAZHAKKULAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SMT.MEREENA JOSEPH RESPONDENTS :

---------------------

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(RURAL) ERNAKULAM - 682031

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THADIYATHA PARAMBA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

3. SUDHAKARAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.KUMARAN, PUTHENPURACKAL, EZHIPARAM KARA, VAZHAKULAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.

4. AMEL, AGED 18 YEARS, S/O.SUDHAKARAN, PUTHENPURACKAL, EZHIPARAM KARA VAZHAKULAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.

R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. RYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 11862 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.421/2012 OF THADIYATTAPARAMBA POLICE STATION.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR POLICE PROTECTION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL.

EXT.P2(A):

TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOR EXT.P2 DATED 28/4/2013.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J. & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.11862 of 2014 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of November, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

SHAFFIQUE, J.

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking police protection alleging that there has been threat from respondents 3 and 4. An interim order has already been passed by this Court on 2.5.2014 directing the police to provide necessary protection to the life of the petitioners on account of threat from respondents 3 and 4.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of the interim order, presently there is no issue between the parties.

3. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the police if any further cause of action arises. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.

ami/ //True copy// P.A. to Judge