Sudhakaran B.B. v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11677 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- SUDHAKARAN B.B., AGED 56 YEARS S/O.BHASKARAN (LATE) BRANCH MANAGER/SUPERINTENDENT HEAD OFFICE, DISTRICT CO.OP. BANK, KOLLAM RESIDING AT KOIPURATH AISWARYA MUNDAKKAL EAST, KOLLAM - 691 001.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.RAMESH SRI.NAVEEN.T SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2.

REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES STATUE JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3.

THE GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE, DISTRICT CO.OP BANK, KOLLAM, CHINNAKADA, KOLLAM - 691 001.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR, SC, KOLLAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.GIKKU JACOB.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.11677 OF 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERFICATE OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF SSLC BOOK OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 22.12.2009 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 3.1.2012 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 1.2.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 17.3.2014 OF THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 14.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.11677 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 9th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner wants to have his date of birth corrected in his SSLC book and service book. Appropriate decision has to be taken in this regard by the first respondent to grant exemption to the petitioner for correction. The first respondent has sought for a report from the third respondent as evident by Ext.P6 communication.

2. I direct the third respondent to submit a report to the first respondent in response to Ext.P6 communication. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that the first respondent will take a decision in the matter of grant of exemption for correction of date of birth without delay.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.