High Court of KeralaWP(C)/11690/2015disposed of

Taranjith Nagpal v. Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-04-08Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/18TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11690 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- TARANJITH NAGPAL S/O. TRILOK NAGPAL 9F, LINK HEIGHT APARTMENT PERUMANOOR, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682 036 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH VIJAYENDRAN RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VYDHYUDHIBHAVANAM PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2.

ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KSEB TRANSMISSION LINE MAINTENANCE SECTION -1 KALAMASSERY - 682 519 3.

THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER KSEB TRANSMISSION LINE MAINTENANCE SECTION-1 KALAMASSERY - 682 519 4.

THE DEPUTY CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR ELECTRICAL INSPECTORATE 4TH FLOOR, THOPPIL ESTATE BUILDING JANATHA, VYTILLA, COCHIN - 682 304 BY SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 11690 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSED PLAN OF THE BUILDING OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER DATED 06.01.2015 EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 08.01.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 11690 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner awaits sanction for the construction of a building. Such sanction is necessary in view of the crossing of overhead electricity line. The matter is pending consideration with the fourth respondent. All that the petitioner prays is that the fourth respondent may finalise the proceedings. 2.

I direct the fourth respondent to take the proceedings to a logical end. The same shall be done within a period of one month from today. I however express no opinion on the merits of the claim.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE