Aditya Medi Sales Ltd. v. Intelligence Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No.11717 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- ADITYA MEDI SALES LTD,MAROTTICKAL BUILDINGS, NM STORES JN.,ANANGAD,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY SRI.K.CHANDRAMOHANAN NAIR.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:
------------------------ 1.
INTELLIGENCE OFFICER(IB),COMMERCIAL TAXES, EDAPPALLY,ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-682024.
2.
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,FOURTH CIRCLE, CLAS TOWER,OLD RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KOCHI-682018.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
WP(C).No.11717 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXT.P1:COPY OF ORDER DATED 30.06.2012 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT. EXT.P2:COPY OF ORDER DATED 6-03-2014 OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),ERNAKULAM.
EXT.P3:COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER FORWARDING THE DD DATED 10-09-2012.
EXT.P3(a):COPY OF BANK GUARANTEE DATED 07-09-2012. EXT.P3(b):COPY OF BANK GUARANTEE DATED 05-11.2014. EXT.P4:COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.2.2015 OF THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
-------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 11717 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May,2015
J U D G M E N T
------------------------- The petitioner approached this Court seeking for a direction to implement the appellate order and also to refund the security deposit and release the bank guarantee furnished by them. It is admitted that the appellate authority was in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner submits that proceedings have become final. Therefore, he is entitled for relief.
2.
On instructions, the learned Government Pleader would submit that Department has already approached the Tribunal in Second Appeal and the Second Appeal is numbered as TA (VAT) 529/2014 and the matter is posted to 5.6.2015. The case of the petitioner is that he is not served with any notice.
3.
I am of the view that if the petitioner makes a request before the Tribunal, the same shall be considered by the Tribunal in accordance with law. Accordingly this
W.P.(C).No.11717 of 2015 writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Tribunal.
Sd/ A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE jm/