Vijayan v. The Commissioner Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11776 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------
1. VIJAYAN, AGED 77 YEARS, CHITTETH HOUSE, 16, MANAVAZHI, KOORKENCHERY, THRISSUR.
2. DEVAYANI, AGED 72, W/O.VIJAYAN, CHITTETH HOUSE, 16, MANAVAZHI, KOORKENCHERY, THRISSUR.
3. GEETHA VIJAYAN, AGED 42 YEARS, D/O.VIJAYAN, CHITTETH HOUSE, 16, MANAVAZHI, KOORKENCHERY, THRISSUR.
4. SMITHA SUNISH, AGED 38 YEARS, D/O.VIJAYAN, CHITTETH HOUSE, 16, MANAVAZHI, KOORKENCHERY, THRISSUR. BY ADVS.SRI.VINOD VALLIKAPPAN SRI.AJIT THOMAS RESPONDENT(S) :- -------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRISSUR, PIN - 680 631.
2. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NEDUPUZHA POLICE STATION, TRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 007.
3. MANI MENON, S/O.SREENADANAM, SITE NUMBER 55, SWARNAPURI, HIGHLINE EXTENSION, 15, VELAMPALAYAM, TIRUPPUR, TAMILNADU, PIN - 641 652.
R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-042015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt
WP(C).No.11776 OF 2015 APPENDIX Petitioners' Exhibits :- Ext.P1 :- True copy of the representation submitted to the 2nd respondent with its English translation with the postal acknowledgment of the receipt by him dated 24.2.2015. Ext.P2 :- True copy of the postal receipt of acknowledgment of a copy of Ext.P1 by the 1st respondent dated 25.2.2015. Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL.
//True Copy// P.A. to Judge
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
---------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11776 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of April 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking police protection. It is inter alia contended that son of the petitioners 1 and 2 is married the daughter of the 3rd respondent and their son is working abroad and there is matrimonial dispute between the son and his wife. It is alleged that on account of such dispute, the 3rd respondent and his men are harassing and threatening the petitioners. Though complaints were given to the police, no action has been taken in the matter.
2.
A perusal of Ext.P1 complaint only discloses general allegations and therefore, we are not inclined to pass any direction as sought for. The police can interfere only if there is any such situation.
Hence, this writ petition is disposed of with the observation that if there is any offence being committed or attempt to commit offence, on the complaint of the petitioners, the police shall look into the matter and do the needful. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Jvt