High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18962/2007disposed of

K.K.Hassankunhi v. The Rta,Kannur

2015-11-09Honourable Mr. Justice Shaji P.Chaly3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/18TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 18962 of 2007 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ K.K.HASSANKUNHI, POOVATH HOUSE, NEAR LOTUS TALKIES, THALASSERY.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR.

GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. P.M. SANEER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 18962 of 2007 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G/25815/02C DATED 25.2.2005 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.10.2005 IN M.V.A.A. NO.562/2005 PASSED BY THE S.T.A.T.

P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 20.01.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.G/25815/05C DATED 20.01.2006 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 10.01.2007 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE smv

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.18962 of 2007 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking to issue directions to the respondents to re-consider the application for regular permit on the route Kalpetta - Konnakkad as modified by Exts.P3 and P5 in accordance with the direction in Ext.P2 order of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and take a decision untrammelled by Ext.P4 proceeding of the RTA.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance with the directions of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the RTA has not taken any decision till today and therefore, a direction to the respondents to take a decision in accordance with Ext.P2 order will suffice the situation.

3. Therefore, there will be a direction to the respondents to take a decision if any grievances are still surviving on the basis of any pending application in accordance with the direction contained in Ext.P2 order passed by the STAT.

Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE smv 09.11.2015