Reeja Jose P. v. The Principal, St.Peter'S College Kollenchery
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11792 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- REEJA JOSE P. AGED 49 YEARS D/O.JOSE CAVID (LATE), UPASANA(H) SASTHRI ROADM THIRUVANKULAM , ERNAKULAM 682 305 WORKING AS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, ENGLISH ST.PETER'S COLLEGE, KOLLENCHERY.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.ROHITH SRI.SAYED MURTHALA THANGAL RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE PRINCIPAL, ST.PETER'S COLLEGE KOLLENCHERY
2. MANAGER, ST.PETER'S COLLEGE KOLLENCHERY
3. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR ATHIRAMPUZHA KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI R3 BY ADV. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 11792 of 2015 (Y) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE DATECD 8/3/2013 OF THE PETITOER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 6/3/2015 ISSUESD BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER DATED 6/4/2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE DETAILED REPLY DATED 7/45/2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 11792 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 5th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The writ petition was filed by the petitioner apprehending that disciplinary proceedings would be initiated against her by the respondent College. By an interim order dated 08.04.2015, this Court while admitting the writ petition, also granted a stay of disciplinary action, pursuant to Ext.P2, for a period of three months. When the matter came up today, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents that, there is no disciplinary proceedings, that is contemplated as of now against the petitioner. The said submission of the learned Standing Counsel for 1st and 2nd respondents is recorded and the writ petition is closed as infructuous.
Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das