Simon v. The Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11799 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- SIMON CHITTILAPPILY KUNNATHU HOUSE P.O. PARAPUR, THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S) :

---------------------------- 1.

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY - 680 001. 2.

THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR - 680001.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 11799 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE PERMIT WITHITS NO. 8/10026/2005 DATED 30.4.2007. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE RENEWAL OF PERMIT APPLICATION DATED 6.3.2015. EXT.P3 COPY OF THE CHELAN RECEIPT DATED 6.3.2015.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE REPLACEMENT APPLICATION DATED 6.3.2015. EXT.P5 COPY OF THE CHELLAN RECEIPT DATED 6.3.2015.

EXT.P6 COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT ON THE ROUTE BUNGALAVUKADAVU-THRISSUR WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 9/M 555. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.11799 of 2015 ====================== Dated this the 9th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner only seeks for consideration of a renewal and replacement application. Both the applications itself are filed only on 06.03.2015. It is trite that, the application can be considered only after obtaining the Filed Officer's report as also considering the need for a service in the route. In such circumstance, definitely, some time may be taken for consideration. There shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the same as expeditiously as possible.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge