Sreedevi v. Tahsildar, Kunnathunad

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11896 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- SREEDEVI, D/O. NARAYANA PILLAI, AMBIKA VILASAM, VAZHAKKULAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.KURIAN ANTONY EDASSERY SMT.ANN EMIL JOSEPH SRI.BOSE K.THACHIL RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE TAHSILDAR, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK

2. VILLAGE OFFICER, VAZHAKKULAM, VAZHAKKULAM , MARAMPILLY P.O, PIN-683107

3. THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, VAZHAKKULAM, MARAMPILLY P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-683107 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER (SR) SRI. K.C. VINCENT. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-042015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 11896 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXT.P1 (A TRUE COPY OF THE PARTITION DEED NO.3454/2005 OF PERUMBAVOOR SUB REGISTRY DATED 4-5-2005) EXT.P2 (A TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE PERIOD 2014-2015 DATED 2-6-2014) EXT.P3 (PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROPERTY TAKEN TO SHOW THE LIE AND NATURE OF THE PROPERTY DATED 14-1-2015) EXT.P4 (A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN JULY 2014) EXT.P5 (THE TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 11-2-2015) EXT.P6 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 12-3-2015) EXT.P7 COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 18-3-2015) RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P. A TO JUDGE SMM-

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON,J ................................................. . .............................................. Dated this the 9th day of April, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"(A) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order to the respondents to consider and take appropriate steps to carryout correction in the date bank regarding the property of the petitioner.

(B) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order to the 3rd respondent to consider Exhibit P-6 and take appropriate steps to carryout correction in the data bank regarding the property of the petitioner.

2. The case of the petitioner is also sought to be highlighted with reference to the reports submitted by various authorities, copies of which have been produced along with the writ petition. The petitioner has already moved the Local Level Monitoring Committee by filing

necessary application for deleting the entry from the draft data bank register . The prayer is to cause the same to be considered and disposed of within a specified time.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

4. After hearing both the sides, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the third respondent who is the convenor of Local Level Monitoring Committee to cause the application if any, to be placed before Local Level Monitoring Committee, who shall conduct a spot inspection with notice to the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner and also in the light of the observation made by the Division Bench of this Court as per the verdict reported in Adani Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2015 (1) KLT 651). The proceedings as above shall be completed at the earliest, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the third respondent for further steps.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE smm