T.S.Jayakrishnan v. Superintendent Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/20TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12082 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------ T.S.JAYAKRISHNAN, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, THERAYANGODU VEEDU, EZHAKKAD P.O., PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.I.DINESH MENON SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOUTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
3. UAE EXCHANGE & FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., 1ST FLOOR, PERUMPILLIL BUILDING, OPPOSITE MAHARAJAS COLLEGE GROUND, M.G. ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 011.
R1 & R2 BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-042015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: jvt
WP(C).No.12082 OF 2015 APPENDIX Petitioner's Exhibits :- Ext.P1 :- True copy of the intimation dated 17.11.2014. Ext.P2 :- True copy of the intimation dated 5.3.15. Ext.P3 :- True copy of the intimation dated 24.2.2015. Ext.P4 :- True copy of the intimation dated 3.3.2015. Ext.P5 :- True copy of the intimation dated 19.1.2015. Ext.P6 :- True copy of the intimation dated 28.2.2015 Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL.
//True Copy// P.A. to Judge
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & SHAJI P. CHALY, J.
---------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.12082 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaji P. Chaly, J.
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs :- "(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any such other writ, direction or orders commanding the 2nd respondent and the officers attached to the station not to harass the petitioner any further;
(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any such other writ, direction or orders commanding the 2nd respondent and the officers attached to the station not to coerce, intimidate or harass the petitioner to effect payments to the customers; (iii) Issue any such other writ, appropriate order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case."
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney.
3.
The complaint of the petitioner is that the police is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner to effect payments to customers. It is submitted that the police authorities have no manner of right to interfere with such matters, which are purely contractual in nature.
4.
Learned State Attorney on instructions would submit that earlier a complaint was received with regard to dishonour of
W.P.(C) No.12082 of 2015 -: 2 :- a cheque issued by the petitioner and thereafter the complaint was settled and the subject matter was closed. It is submitted that at present there is no complaint.
The submission of the learned State Attorney is recorded and writ petition is closed accordingly. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE Jvt