← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12119/2015disposed of

Renjithkumar K.G. v. State Of Kerala

2015-04-10Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/20TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No.12119 of 2015 (L) -------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------- RENJITHKUMAR K.G., HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT(MATHS), SREE NARAYANA TRUST HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL (SNTHSS), THOTTADA, KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.POOVAMULLE PARAMBIL ABDULKAREEM SRI.K.N.KUMARASWAMY SARMA RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PALAKKAD-678001.

4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ALAPPUZHA-688001.

5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM-679101.

6. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHERTHALA-688524.

7. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, SREE NARAYANA TRUST SCHOOLS, P.B.NO.63, KOLLAM-691001.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER M.A.FAYAZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.12119 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO DATED 27.6.2007 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B5/4502/07 DATED 8.8.2007 ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION DATED 10.9.2007 SUBMITTED BY 7TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS B5/25490/07 DATED 22.1.2008 PASSED BY 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EM(1)22212/08/DPI/K.DIS DATED 9.7.2008 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 16.8.2008 SUBMITTED BY 7TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.77739/A1/2008/G.EDN.DATED 16.2.2009 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P8 : TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 2.6.2008 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P9 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.DS/4502/08 DATED 14.8.2008 OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P10: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION DATED 5.9.2008 SUBMITTED BY 7TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P11: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.B5/23971/08 DATED 24.11.2008 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P12: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 21.1.2009 SUBMITTED BY 7TH RESPONDENT BEFORE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P13: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.EM(1)9431/09/DPI/K/DIS. DATED 8.12.2009 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P14: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.SNT 16/2009 DATED 27.7.2009 ISSUED BY 7TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P15: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 23.7.2009 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P16: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.EC(1)36404/2010/DPI DATED 1.1.2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P17: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 23.10.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P18: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION/REPRESENTATION DATED 1.3.2015 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************** W.P.(C) No.12119 of 2015 ***************************************************** Dated this the 10th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the Government by Ext.P18 revision petition. The petitioner claims that the above revision is filed on account of declining to grant approval from the initial date of appointment.

In view of the pendency of Ext.P18, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the same after hearing the petitioner within a period of four months. The petitioner is free to place any dictum of this Court or any other materials before the first respondent to substantiate the contention in the writ petition.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln