High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12230/2015dismissed as withdrawn

E.K.Jose v. Sbt, Muvattupuzha

2015-04-10Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/20TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12230 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- 1.

E.K.JOSE, ADVOCATE ELANJICKAL HOUSE, VIKAS NAGAR MUVATTUPUZHA 2.

REETHAMMA MATHEW, ADVOCATE W/O. E.K. JOSE, ELANJICKAL HOUSE VIKAS NAGAR, MUVATTUPUZHA 3.

JOSEPH J.KUNJITHOMMEN, PROPRIETOR, M/S.KEECHERIKUDIYIL AGENCIES, ELANJICKAL HOUSE, VIKAS NAGAR, MUVATTUPUZHA BY ADV. SRI.PAULSON THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER MUVATTUPUZHA BRANCH- 686 661 2.

AUTHORIZED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER (SARFAESI ACT). STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE MUVATTUPUZHA- 686 661 R BY SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW R BY SRI.SATHISH NINAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 12230 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE TO 1ST PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE TO 3RD PETITIONER EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE UNDER RULE 8(1) TO 1ST PETITIONER EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE UNDER RULE 8(1) TO 3RD PETITIONER EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE UNDER RULE 8(6) DATED 27.3.2015. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE PUBLISHED IN INDIAN EXPRESS DAILY DATED 26.03.2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 12230 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 10th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to rights to move the Debt Recovery Tribunal for a similar relief. The permission is granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to move the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das