K.Sarath Chandran v. Deputy Director, All India Radio, Tvm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/20TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12257 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- K.SARATH CHANDRAN , T.C.35/1804, THIRUMALA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 006.
BY ADV. SRI.S.VISHNU RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ALL INDIA RADIO, BHAKTHI VILASOM, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
2. THE STATION DIRECTOR, ALL INDIA RADIO, BHAKTHI VILASOM, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.
3. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL, SOUTH ZONE, ALL INDIA RADIO, RAJ BHAVAN ROAD, BANGALAORE - 560 001.
4. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, ALL INDIA RADIO, AKASHAVANI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, A S G OF INDIA BY SRI.KRISHNADAS P.NAIR, CGC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 12257 of 2015 (F) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER AND ALL INDIA RADIO TRIVANDRUM FOR THE YEAR 2014-2015. EXHIBIT P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION NO.TVM.3(2)2015 DATED 23.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.AIR.TVM3(2)/2015 DATED 17.3.2015 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 1.4.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 1.4.2015 ADDRESSED TO THE TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE mbr/
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
-------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 12257 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
"1) A writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to hold a retender in the matter of contract covered by Exhibit P2. 2) A writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P4 and P5 respectively.
3) A writ or certiorari or other appropriate writ or order to call for the records leading to orders passed by respondents 1 & 2 rejecting the technical bid of the petitioner and set aside the same.
4) Any other further relief or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet the ends of justice. 5) Award the cost of these proceedings."
2.
Heard both the sides. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merit of the case. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 4th respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It shall be done, at the earliest, at any
WP(c). No.12257 of 2015 rate, within 'six weeks' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 4th respondent for further steps.
Sd/- P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Pn