The Trichur District Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12655 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------------- THE TRICHUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., TRICHUR, REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM RESPONDENTS :
--------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRICHUR.
2. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, TRICHUR (RURAL).
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, TRICHUR.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM.
5. THE SUB INSPECOR OF POLICE, TRICHUR EAST.
6. E.P.PRABASH, SECRETARY, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK COLLECTION AGENTS ASSOCIATION, TRICHUR.
R1 TO R5 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR. R6 BY ADV. SRI.M.M.MONAYE SRI.M.PAUL VARGHESE SRI.DESI MATTHAI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 12655 of 2014 (F) -------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 31.05.2010 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE BANK AND THE COLLECTION AGENTS.
EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 10.05.2014 GIVEN TO THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TRICHUR EAST.
EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 14.05.2014 GIVEN TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 14.05.2014 GIVEN TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------ NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.C.J. & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 12655 OF 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 7th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
Shaffique, J.
The petitioner Bank has approached this Court seeking for police protection in the matter relating to conduct of its banking activities at the head office and various other branches. The Writ Petition came to be filed at a time when there were certain issues with reference to claims made by the Bank Collection Agents. The apprehension expressed was that they may obstruct the functioning of the banking activities. An interim order was issued by this Court on 16.05.2014. Learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent submits that their claims are pending adjudication in several other writ petitions and most of them are still working in the Bank.
2. Learned Government Pleader submits that after the alleged incident, no untoward incident has occurred in the matter. Under such circumstances, we do not think that further orders are necessary in the matter. However, we make
WP(C) No. 12655 of 2014 -:2:- it clear that if there is any further obstruction, it shall be open for the petitioner Bank to file a complaint before the Police, who shall look into it and dispose of the same in accordance with law. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Ashok Bhushan, Acting Chief Justice.
A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
ttb/07/01