Noushad v. Village Officer, Thodupuzha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/29TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 15132 of 2013 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------- NOUSHAD, AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.MARAKKAR, CHEMMALAKUDY HOUSE, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, PATTIMATTAM, PERUMBAVUR, ERNAKULAM(OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-40-E-7838) BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENTS :
-----------
1. VILLAGE OFFICER, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN - 685 584
2. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN - 685 584.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-12-2013 ALONG WITH WPC 15768/2013 & CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BP
WP(C).No. 15132 of 2013 (N) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
----------------------- EXT.P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE MAHASAR PREPARED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT DATED 10.6.2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
----------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE BP
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
======================== W.P.(C). Nos.15132, 15768, 29602, 29821, 30401, 31406, 31407 & 31411 of 2013 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of December, 2013
JUDGMENT
The power and authority of the concerned respondents (Police/Revenue/Mining and Geology Department) to effect seizure of the vehicles engaged in raising/transporting 'ordinary earth' in contravention of the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) act, 1957/ Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as 'MMDR Act/KMMC Rules') is under challenge in all these writ petitions. The issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court as per common judgment dated 19.12.2013 in W.P.(C).No. 12398 of 2013 and connected cases and it stands against the petitioners. In the said circumstance, interference is declined and all these writ petitions are dismissed accordingly.
2. It is made clear that, the dismissal of these writ petitions will not stand in the way of the petitioners in seeking for compounding the offence in view of the enabling provisions under the MMDR Act, 1957 and the KMMC Rules, 1967.
3. Coming to the extent of amount to be satisfied as compounding fee, the Rules specifically stipulate that any
W.P.C. No.15132/13 & conn. cases -2offence under the Rules can be compounded subject to the satisfaction of the maximum fine prescribed under the Rules, which is stated as Rs. 5,000/-. But in respect of the transportation of sand/earth without any valid pass/sanction, it is stated as an offence under the 'Act' itself by virtue of the incorporation of Section 4(1A), for which separate penalty is provided under the 'Act' itself. The maximum fine in respect of such offence prescribed under the 'Act' is stated as ₹ 25,000/-. It is in the said circumstance, that this Court has been passing orders enabling the concerned petitioners to have interim custody of the vehicle on satisfaction of a sum of ₹ 25,000/-, also directing the concerned respondent to consider the application for compounding, if any.
4. If the petitioners are desirous to have the offence compounded, conceding the guilt, it is for them to approach the concerned respondent/authorised officer by filing necessary application in this regard and once the offence is compounded, no further prosecution proceedings shall lie against them. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
kp/-