Anantharaman P.N. v. Asst. General Manager(Production)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 19672 of 2007 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- ANANTHARAMAN P.N., OPERATOR GRADE II, EMP NO. 850, CORE SHOP, TELK ANGAMALLY.

BY ADVS.SRI.LIJU. M.P SRI.G.PADMARAJ RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (PRODUCTION) TRANSFORMERS & ELECTRICALS KERALA LIMITED ANGAMALLY.

2. T.P.GOVINDAN, MANAGER (PERSONAL), ENQUIRY OFFICER, TELK, ANGAMALLY.

3. P.A.ABDUL RASHEED, PRESENTING OFFICER (ENQUIRY), TELK, ANGAMALLY.

4. MANAGING DIRECTOR, TELK, ANGAMALLY.

R1&R4 BY ADVS. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.) SRI.SAJI VARGHESE R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

smv

SHAJI P. CHALY, J.

----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No.19672 of 2007 ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 submits that the subject matter of the challenge in the writ petition is with regard to the dismissal of the petitioner from the establishment. During the pendency of the writ petition, management has proceeded against the petitioner, conducted domestic enquiry and finally culminated in punishment by which petitioner was terminated from service. Thereafter the labour court has sustained enquiry and the decision of the management. So also, according to the counsel, the petitioner has challenged the award of the labour court by filing W.P.(C) No.20166/2012. Therefore, according to him, the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the submissions so made by the counsel for respondents 1 to 4, this writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE //true copy// smv P.A. To Judge