High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12645/2015disposed of

Chithukutty v. State Of Kerala

2015-04-21Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/1ST VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------------ CHITHUKUTTY AIDUPILLA, AGED 78 YEARS W/O. AIDUPILLA, ELANGAYIL HOUSE, EAST VAZHAPPILLY -P.O NIRAPPE-686 673 BY ADV. SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001

2. PAYIPRA PANCHAYATH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, PAYIPRA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT- 686 673

3. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004 REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH R3 BY SRI. M.AJAY, SC, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 12645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR LICENSE DATED 26-03-2015. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF CONSENT NO .PCB/EKM/DO2/IC-F/58/2015 DATED 27-02-2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO. 458/2014 DATED 17-12-2014 ISSUED BY THE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE

C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

========================== W.P.(C) No.12645 OF 2015 ========================== Dated this the 21st day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner is regarding the delay in the matter of consideration of Ext.P1 application submitted by her for license to start a poultry farm. The contention of the petitioner is that she has produced all the requisite documents before the second respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned standing counsel appearing for the third respondent and also the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Secretary of the second respondent to consider Ext.P1 application, if it is accompanied by all the requisite documents, expeditiously and in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- C.T. RAVIKUMAR (JUDGE) spc/

W.P.(C).12645/15 C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

W.P.(C).12645/15

JUDGMENT

September, 2010