William John v. The Sub Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No.12663 of 2015 (G) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER'S:
---------------------- 1.
WILLIAM JOHN,AGED 54 YEARS,S/O.LATE JOHN, JOHNS,URUVACHAL,P.O.CHOVVA,KANNUR DISTRICT.
2.
BEENA WILLIAM,AGED 49 YEARS,W/O.WILLIAM JOHNS, URUVACHAL,P.O.CHOVVA,KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SMT.C.DEVIKA RANI KAIMAL RESPONDENT'S:
------------------------- 1.
THE SUB COLLECTOR,SUB COLLECTORS OFFICE, THALASSERY-670 101.
2.
MARY JOHN,W/O.LATE JOHN,JOHNS,URUVACHAL, P.O.CHOVVA,KANNUR DISTRICT-670 006.
R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN.
R2 BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.AMARESAN SRI.V.N.RAMESAN NAMBISAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
WP(C).No.12663 of 2015 (G) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXT.P1:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLCE, WOMEN-CELL, KANNUR.
EXT.P2:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3:TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 03.2.2015 ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER.
EXT.P4:TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS DATED 12.2.2015 FILED BY THE FIRST PETITIONER.
EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTIONS DATED 12.2.2015 FILED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER.
EXT.P6:TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P7:TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE SECOND PETITIONER BEFORE THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON 09.4.2015. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 12663 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The above writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P6. The learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that final orders have been passed and now he has to challenge that order. Leaving open the remedy, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy/ P.A to Judge