Jos Dennis P.William v. The State Public Information Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/22ND JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12673 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- JOS DENNIS P.WILLIAM, PANANJIKAL HOUSE, MOOLANKUZHI, LORETTO CHURCH ROAD, MUNDAMVELI PO, KOCHI-682 507.
BY ADV. SRI.V.JOHN MANI.
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER & PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ERNAKULAM.
2. STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN & BY SRI.M.AJAY, SC, STATE INFORMATION COMMN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rvs.
WP(C).No. 12673 of 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------ EXT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 6 OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 DATED 30-11-2012. EXT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28-10-2014 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.AP288(7)/2013/SIC BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12-01-2015 TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE A/D CARD EVIDENCING RECEIPT OF EXT P3 LETTER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION UNDER SECTION 20 OF THE RTI ACT DATED 4-3-2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------ NIL.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.12673 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of June, 2015.
JUDGMENT
Since, the petitioner confines the relief to disposal of Ext.P5, an application filed under the Right to Information Act,2005, it is only proper that the respondents consider the application expeditiously at any rate within four months from the date of production of the certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not found anything on the merits of the claim. The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp