T.K.Chakrapani & Another v. State Of Kerala & Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/22ND SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16597 of 2010 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
1. T.K.CHAKRAPANI, C/O.SRIKRISHNAN.C, FLAT NO.13B, SKYLINE `AMITY PARK', NEAR CHANGANPUZHA, OPP:GOVT. U.P.SCHOOL, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI-682 024.
2.
JAYALAKSHMI CHAKRAPANI, DO. DO.
BY ADV. SRI.N.DHARMADAN (SR.) RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.
LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. CORPORATION OF THRISSUR, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THRISSUR.
3. CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. SRI.MANUEL, MANAGING DIRECTOR, MANUELSONS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, (P) LTD. M.O.ROAD, THRISSUR-1.
R-2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN R-2 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR R4 BY ADV. SRI.O.RAMACHANDRAN NAMBIAR R4 BY ADV. SRI.GEEN T.MATHEW R1 & 3 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVEENDRAN R2 BY SMT.KRIPA ELIZABETH MATHEWS R2 BY ADV. SRI.V.N.HARIDAS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: rvs.
WP(C).No. 16597 of 2010 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------- EXT.P1:
TRUE COPY OF PLAN.
EXT.P1(A): TRUE COPY OF LAYOUT.
EXT.P1(B): TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONS.
EXT.P2:
TRUE COPY OF LIST OF BUILDINGS NUMBERS.
EXT.P3:
TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT GRANTED TO SRI.STANLY THOMAS. EXT.P3(A): TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT GRANTED TO SRI.VARGHESE GEORGE. EXT.P3(B): TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT GRANTED TO SRI.GEORGE. EXT.P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION.
EXT.P4(A): TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
EXT.P5:
TRUE COPY OF ORDER IN WPC NO.20384/2009 DATED 11/08/09. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------ NIL.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.16597 of 2010 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 13th day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
It appears from records that there was a direction to the respondents to pass orders on Ext.P4 application submitted by the petitioners for grant of building permit in accordance with law. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that subsequently, the property has been sold by the petitioner to a third party. As there is no surviving cause of action, the writ petition is closed without examining the merits.
Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj
WP(C) -:2:-