← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12770/2015disposed of

K.Sathyan v. The Secretary,Regional Transport Authority

2015-04-21Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/1ST VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12770 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------- K.SATHYAN, S/O.KRISHNAN, MATTUPARA HOUSE, NEMMARA P.O.

PALAKKAD DISITRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (TR) SRI.T.P.SAJAN RESPONDENTS:

-----------------

1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD-678 001.

2. K.K.BABU, S/O.KRISHNAN KUTTI, KALAPPARAMBU HOUSE, MALAKKULAM MELARCODE P.O., ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 009. R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 12770 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS --------------------------- EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OPERATED WITH KL-10-M 8715. EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 16/4/2015 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL ----------------------------- // TRUE COPY // TKS P.S. TO JUDGE

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.

------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.12770 of 2015 ------------------------------- Dated 21st April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a regular permit holder operating on the route Olippara-Palakkad with vehicle bearing No.KL-10 M 8715. The 2nd respondent had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.12636 of 2015 seeking a direction to the Secretary of the Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad to consider the application for temporary permit submitted by him pending consideration of the application for regular permit. As per judgment dated 17.4.2015 the same was directed to be considered. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 objection filed by the petitioner while settling the timings in favour of the 2nd respondent pursuant to the grant of a temporary permit in tune with the directions in the judgment in W.P.(C)No.12636 of 2015. In view of the order I propose to pass in this writ petition I do not think it necessary to issue notice to the 2nd respondent. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader this writ petition is disposed of

WP(C).No.12770/2015 with a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P2 objection filed by the petitioner before issuing temporary permit to the 2nd respondent, if not already issued.

Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS